Through the following links, you can move to the menu or to the main text in this page.

Corporate Governance

The Company has designated “long-term and stable growth of corporate value” as its highest management priority. To realize this aim, the Company considers enhancement of the satisfaction of all the Company’s stakeholders and improvement of overall corporate value, while balancing economic value and social value, to be important. Especially, in order to achieve the long-term objectives of building “Global MajorBrand Kubota” on the basis of its corporate philosophy “Kubota Global Identity,” the Company must be an enterprise that is trusted not just in Japan but also worldwide. In order to enhance the soundness, efficiency, and transparency of business management, which are essential to earn trust, the Company is striving to strengthen its corporate governance.

Corporate Governance System

Policy of Organization Structure

The Company is basically a company with an Audit & Supervisory Board but also has a voluntary Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Committee. The Company has a wide range of business domains that include the areas of food, water, and the environment. Considering the scope of these domains, the Company believes that the most appropriate governance structure is one in which the Board of Directors makes decisions on major fundamental management policies, based on the perspectives of internal Directors within-depth experience and knowledge in particular areas of the Company’s businesses as well as the objective viewpoints and broad knowledge of Outside Directors. The Board of Directors also supervises and oversees the Executive Officers’conduct of business. On the other hand, the Audit & Supervisory Board Members, who are legally independent from the Board of Directors, provide a monitoring function through the highly effective, independent audit function. The Company believes having the voluntary Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Committee, where the majority of members are Outside Directors, enables it to secure objectivity and transparency on matters regarding personnel and remuneration of officers, etc., and attain sustainable growth and increase its corporate value in the medium to long term while securing sound, efficient, and effective business management.

  • Corporate Governance Structure

    Corporate Governance Structure

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors makes strategic decisions and oversees the execution of duties by the Executive Officers. In addition to its regular monthly board meetings, it also meets as and when required to discuss and make decisions relating to management planning, financial planning, investment, business restructuring, and other important management issues.

Audit & Supervisory Board

Kubota has the Audit & Supervisory Board independently, which oversees and audits the execution of duties by the Directors.
In addition to its regular monthly Audit & Supervisory Board Meetings, it also meets as and when required to discuss and make decisions on auditing policy, audit reports, and other matters.

Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Committee

The Company has a voluntary Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Committee in place as the advisory body of the Board of Directors.To incorporate the independent and objective standpoint, Outside Directors account for more than half of constituent members of both committees, and an Independent Outside Director serves as chairperson of the committees.

The Nomination Advisory Committee met three times during the fiscal year for the purpose of deliberating the nomination of candidates for Director and the nomination of Advisors. The committee is also looking at the composition and diversity of the Board of Directors using the skills matrix. Starting in fiscal 2022, the committee added matters related to electing as well as dismissing a president along with succession planning to its agenda once again and actively discusses the qualities and abilities required of the Company’s top management in addition to training methods.

Activity Report of the Nomination Advisory Committee
(Period: January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022)
1 March 15, 2022 Discussion on efforts to build a fair and transparent governance system and deliberation on the evaluation sheet of the President at the time of setting the 2022 targets.
2 September 21, 2022 Deliberation on the succession plan of the President and requirements for presidential candidates, and progress report on the evaluation sheet of the President.
3 October 25, 2022 Deliberation on candidates for the Board of Directors and Advisors.

The Compensation Advisory Committee met seven times during the fiscal year for the purpose of discussing both the consistency of levels of compensation paid to the Directors, Executive Officers, and Advisors, and the adequacy of the compensation system. Under the current compensation system, the committee set competitive remuneration levels appropriate for a GMB, and introduced an evaluation system that is strongly linked to growth over the short, medium and long term in order to realize the Company’s Long-Term Vision as set forth in “GMB2030.”

Activity Report of the Compensation Advisory Committee (Period: January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2022)
1 February 3, 2022 Deliberation on setting targets for each evaluation indicator for the year 2022.
2 February 24, 2022 Deliberation on setting targets for each evaluation indicator for the year 2022.
3 June 7, 2022 Reporting activities concerning K-ESG evaluation indicators for the first half of the year and deliberation on setting targets for the second half.
4 July 6, 2022 Reporting activities concerning K-ESG evaluation indicators for the first half of the year and deliberation on setting targets for the second half.
5 October 28, 2022 Reverification of the current remuneration plan and deliberation on setting remuneration levels for the year 2023.
6 November 30, 2022 Deliberation on the policy for determination of remuneration for the Directors and the remuneration amount for the year 2023.
7 December 14, 2022 Reporting activities concerning K-ESG evaluation indicators for the second half of the year and deliberation on its evaluation.
Composition of Members (as of March 24, 2023) Those in brackets [ ] indicate percentage of attendance in fiscal 2022.
Nomination Advisory Committee Compensation Advisory Committee
Outside Director Yuzuru Matsuda [100%]

(Chairperson)

(Chairperson)

Koichi Ina [100%]
Yutaro Shintaku [100%]
Kumi Arakane [100%]
Koichi Kawana [ - ]*
President and Representative Director Yuichi Kitao [100%]
Executive Vice President and Representative Director Masato Yoshikawa [100%]
Senior Managing Executive Officer Kazuhiro Kimura [100%]
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member Yuichi Yamada [100%]

(Observer)

  • Appointed on March 24, 2023

ESG Management Strategy Meeting, Management Committee and Investment Council

The Company has established the ESG Management Strategy Meeting, the Management Committee and the Investment Council to make decisions and deliberate on specific important issues. The ESG Management Strategy Meeting formulates policies and evaluates major measures for the realization of the Long‐Term Vision of the Company, GMB2030, and the creation of medium- to long‐term corporate value. The Management Committee deliberates and make decisions on important management issues, such as investments and loans, in accordance with the Mid‐Term Business Plan 2025. Of the management issues deliberated by the Management Committee, important issues are reported to the Board of Directors. The Investment Council serves as an advisory body to the President on issues that require authorization of the President and certain special issues, excluding items discussed by the Management Committee.

Officers

Reasons for Appointment of Outside Officers

Outside Directors
Name Reasons for Appointment
Yuzuru Matsuda As the person responsible for medical research at Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd., Mr. Matsuda worked on organizational reforms to a research system, and after becoming president there he oversaw a management merger with Kirin Pharma Company. Even after the merger, as president of the new company, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, he demonstrated firm leadership in directing employees from both of the merged companies. He has extensive experience in management and a wide range of expertise. Moreover, he actively offers advice of Kubota’s overall management from a broader perspective. He has also contributed to the improvement of effectiveness in his role as chair of both the Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Committee. As such, he is judged to be a continuing benefit to Kubota’s sustainable growth and to enhancing its corporate value.
Koichi Ina With a career that has involved various positions in charge of factories or manufacturing for Toyota Motor Corporation, Mr. Ina has striven toward the development of production technologies as well as manufacturing site processes and personnel training. After his time at Toyota, he was appointed president at Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. He has extensive experience as a leader in the light vehicle industry, in areas such as constructing global development and production systems, and a wide range of expertise. Moreover, he actively offers advice, particularly from a manufacturing perspective. As such, he is judged to be a continuing benefit to Kubota’s sustainable growth and to enhancing its corporate value.
Yutaro Shintaku During his time as president of Terumo Corporation, Mr. Shintaku took a number of measures to ensure the Company could overcome intense international competition, including global expansion, M&As, and restructuring of the Company’s business portfolio. He has a high degree of skill and an impressive track record as a manager able to read trends. Moreover, he actively offers advice, particularly from his knowledge of capital policies. As such, he is judged to be a continuing benefit to Kubota’s sustainable growth and to enhancing its corporate value.
Kumi Arakane After being appointed as a researcher to work on fundamental cosmetics research at KOSÉ Corporation, Ms. Arakane’s career has covered assignments in charge of a wide range of fields, including product development, R&D, quality assurance, and purchasing. She has experience in being involved in management as a director and also possesses knowledge relating to auditing the execution of duties as a full-time auditor. Moreover, she actively offers advice from varied perspectives. As such, she is judged to be a continuing benefit to Kubota’s sustainable growth and to enhancing its corporate value.
Koichi Kawana Mr. Kawana’s career has involved responsibility for a business site outside Japan for JGC Holdings Corporation, and he is well-versed in international business. In 2011, he was appointed as president there, and led megaprojects inside and outside Japan and business investment in infrastructure fields. He possesses extensive expertise and experience in management. In view of his deep insight, he is judged to be contributing to Kubota’s sustainable growth and to enhancing its corporate value, as well as to the strengthening of the supervisory function of the Board of Directors.
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Name Reasons for Appointment
Yuichi Yamada Mr. Yamada has considerable knowledge relating to accounting and financial matters as a certified public accountant. He has gained extensive experience and a record of accomplishments in corporate auditing while serving at a major audit firm, and possesses extensive expertise on auditing in general, such as through working as an outside audit & supervisory board member for other companies. Therefore, despite not having been directly involved in corporate management, the Company judged that he can contribute to further enhancing its auditing processes through his expert viewpoints and from an independent standpoint.
Yuri Furusawa Ms. Furusawa has experience in Japan and overseas in various roles working for central governmental agencies and possesses a broad perspective and extensive knowledge. Furthermore, she gained global experience through being involved in overseas business development at a company, and she was involved in reforming work styles and promoting the empowerment of women and diversity at the center of the government. Therefore, despite not having been directly involved in corporate management, the Company judged that she can contribute to further enhancing its auditing processes with her wide range of experience, through her expert viewpoints and from an independent standpoint.
Keijiro Kimura Mr. Kimura possesses a wealth of knowledge in legal affairs. He also has an extensive record of practice in corporate legal affairs at law offices and considerable experience and knowledge acquired by assuming office as an outside auditor for several companies. Therefore, despite not having been directly involved in corporate management, the Company judged that he can contribute to further enhancing its auditing processes with his wide range of experience, through his expert viewpoints and from an independent standpoint.

Efforts for Making the Board of Directors More Effective

Evaluation of the Board of Directorsʼ Effectiveness

In order to maintain and improve the function of the Board of Directors, the Company employs a continuous cycle for improvement, wherein it evaluates the Board of Directors’effectiveness at the end of each fiscal year, identifies issues in light of the evaluation findings, and develops an action plan to address them, and this plan is then implemented by the Board of Directors the following year

Value Up Discussion Meeting

The Company regularly holds Value Up Discussion Meetings to provide members of the Board with opportunities to discuss topics bringing about sustainable growth and increasing corporate value. The purpose of the meeting is to exchange opinions and share information, and the contents of discussions are communicated to the executive as necessary.

Past Discussions

July 2021 Carbon Neutrality
  • Attitude toward carbon neutrality
  • Efforts to reduce GHG emissions and develop negative emissions technologies
October 2021 K-ESG management
  • Definition of K-ESG management
  • Materiality for K-ESG management
January 2022 Constructive Dialogue with Shareholders
  • Approach to realizing growth strategies and accountability
  • IR and SR activities for institutional and individual investors
April 2022 Looking back on VUDM and its future
  • Purpose and vision of VUDM, operation method, and selection of themes to address
October 2022 Group risk management
  • Risk identification process
  • Company-wide risk control system

Remuneration

Currently, the Company is committed to shift to business operations with ESG positioned at the core of management under the Long‐Term Vision“GMB2030,” with the aim of further strengthening the supervisory function of the Board of Directors (i.e. enhancing corporate governance). Under these circumstances, Kubota Corporation reviewed the remuneration plan for the Directors as responsibilities and expectations of the Directors are increasing. Following is the policy for determination of remuneration, etc. and its calculation method for the Directors and Executive Officers.

Basic policy for determination of remuneration, etc. for the Directors
a) The purpose of the remuneration for the Directors, excluding Outside Directors, is to encourage the Directors, excluding Outside Directors, to take the lead for sustainable growth while fulfilling social responsibilities as a company aiming to become a GMB.
  • Motivate the Directors to achieve performance targets by reflecting in their remuneration quantitative and objective evaluation results based on financial performance indicators.
  • Accelerate K‐ESG management initiatives by reflecting evaluation results of the progress of the K‐ESG in remuneration of the Directors.
  • Encourage the Directors to hold shares of Kubota Corporation during their tenure and make them strongly aware of the need to sustainably improve corporate value through a remuneration system that is closely linked to shareholder value.
  • Set the levels of remuneration and performance linkage so that the Directors may receive remuneration that is equivalent to or greater than the standard remuneration at other GMB companies defined by Kubota Corporation, in line with the achievement of the performance targets and K‐ESG, and improvement of corporate value.
b) To achieve the purpose of the remuneration, transparency and objectivity must be ensured in the administration of the remuneration plan.
  • Decisions on the development and administration of remuneration policies shall be reviewed by the Compensation Advisory Committee, where a majority of members are Outside Directors, before being determined by the Board of Directors’ resolution.
  • In order to fulfill accountability for shareholders precisely, disclosure shall be made not limited to the scope required by laws and regulations, but also to facilitate shareholders’ understanding and dialogue with them.

Remuneration structure

The remuneration for the Directors, excluding Outside Directors, consists of basic remuneration, which is fixed, and performance‐linked remuneration.
The composition ratio of basic remuneration to performance‐linked remuneration for the President and Representative Director is generally set at 1:2, to secure a high level of performance linkage suitable for a competitive remuneration level. As for the remuneration structure for the Directors other than the President and Representative Director, the Directors at a higher corporate rank earn a greater portion of performance‐linked remuneration, given the size of their duties, etc. of each corporate rank. The performance‐linked remuneration consists of annual bonuses intended to encourage the Directors to achieve the business size and profitability targets of each fiscal year, and stock compensation (restricted stock unit and performance share unit) intended to share shareholder value and promote the maximization of medium‐ to long‐term corporate value. The ratio of annual bonuses to stock compensation is generally set at 1:1.
The only remuneration for the Outside Directors is basic remuneration, which is a fixed remuneration, since the Outside Directors are expected to supervise the Board of Directors and give objective advice on management from positions independent from the conduct of business.

  • Image of Remuneration Composition Ratios for the President and Representative Director (Comparison: current plan vs. new plan)

    Image of Remuneration Composition Ratios for the President and Representative Director (Comparison: current plan vs. new plan)
Elements of Remuneration
Type of remuneration Overview
Basic remuneration [Fixed remuneration set in proportion to the size of duties by corporate rank, etc.]
  • The individual amount of basic remuneration shall be decided at the meeting of the Board of Directors based on the details of confirmation and deliberation by the Compensation Advisory Committee: the amount of total basic remuneration divided by 12 is paid monthly on the same pay day as employees’ salaries.
Annual bonus [Cash remuneration intended to encourage the achievement of business size and profitability‐related performance targets set for each fiscal year and accelerate the K‐ESG management efforts]
  • Consists of a portion linked to company‐wide performance (50‐70% of the bonus based on corporate rank), a portion of individual evaluation (10‐30%), and portion of K‐ESG evaluation (20%).
  • The portion linked to company‐wide performance varies between 0% and 200% of the base amount in proportion to the degree of achievement in the targeted consolidated revenue and operating profit margin, which are key indicators under the Mid‐Term Business Plan 2025.
  • The portion of individual evaluation varies between 0% and 200% of the base amount in proportion to the degree of achievement in strategic company‐wide targets, specific targets in the efforts under the Mid‐Term Business Plan 2025, financial targets for the area(s) the person is in charge of, etc. that are set at the beginning of the fiscal year based on individual responsibilities/jurisdiction.
  • The portion of K‐ESG evaluation varies between 0% and 200% of the base amount in proportion to the degree of achi evement in K‐ESG promotion targets set at the beginning of the fiscal year.
  • The target setting in and the evaluation result of each evaluation category shall be decided at the meeting of the Board of Directors based on the details of confirmation and deliberation by the Compensation Advisory Committee: paid annually in March, in principle.
Restricted stock unit [Stock compensation intended to encourage continued shareholding while in service / office, through which the sharing of and improvements in shareholder value are promoted]
  • The number of restricted stocks specified for each corporate rank shall be issued generally after the closing of each fiscal year, from the trust that sets Kubota Corporation as the entruster. In principle, the transfer restriction of issued share shall be lifted at the time of retirement (which means the point of time when they are no longer Directors or Executive Officers of Kubota Corporation; the same applies hereinafter).
Performance share unit [Stock compensation for the purpose of improving the shareholder value by achieving the medium‐ to long‐term performance target]
  • Restricted stocks are generally issued after the end of each performance evaluation period from the trust that sets Kubota Corporation as the entruster, in accordance with the results of the financial evaluation of the three‐year performance evaluation period. In principle, the transfer restriction of issued shares shall be lifted when Directors, etc. retire.
  • Return on invested capital (ROIC) on a net income basis is used as a financial evaluation indicator to encourage the maximization of corporate value over the medium to long term through efficient profit generation on invested capital. The number of shares to be issued in proportion to the degree of achievement varies between 0% and 200%.

(Note) In accordance with the resolution of the 132nd Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on March 18, 2022, Kubota Corporation introduced a performance‐linked stock compensation plan using a trust. This plan is a stock compensation plan by which a trust, established through the contribution of monies by Kubota Corporation, acquires Company shares, and the number of Company shares corresponding to the number of points to be granted by Kubota Corporation to each Director is delivered to each Director through the Trust. Consequently, Kubota Corporation has discontinued restricted stock compensation and granting restricted stocks under the previous plan.

Remuneration level

In order to properly secure competitiveness in terms of compensation suitable for a GMB company, Kubota Corporation appropriately sets the level of remuneration for the Directors, excluding Outside Directors, based on their corporate ranks and duties, by using data on objective executive remuneration surveys conducted by an external specialized institution, etc. to identify a group of companies whose size, profitability, type of business, overseas networks, etc. are comparable to those of Kubota Corporation as a benchmark for comparison.

Shareholding guideline

For the purpose of deepening the level of shared value with its shareholders, Kubota Corporation encourages the Directors, excluding OutsideDirectors, to hold Kubota Corporation’s stock basically as follows:
President and Representative Director: stock worth three times the basic remuneration by five years from taking office
Other Directors: stock worth 2.4 to 2.7 times the basic remuneration by five years from taking office

Clawback / recovery of remuneration, etc. (malus and clawback clauses)

The Company has compensation clawback clauses (i.e. malus and clawback clauses) for the restricted stock unit and the performance share unit to be granted to the Directors. If an incident of misconduct, etc. involving the Directors (including those retired) of Kubota Corporation arises or such a fact comes to light, the Company may claim the return, etc. of pre‐issue points to receive shares, and all or part of the issued restricted stock and shares after the transfer restriction is lifted. The decision on claims for return, etc. and their details shall be reviewed by the Compensation Advisory Committee before being determined by the Board of Directors’resolution.

Remuneration determination process

The Company’s policy on the decision of the details of remuneration for the Directors and the details of individual remuneration, etc. shall be decided by resolution of the Board of Directors based on the result of objective deliberation by the Compensation Advisory Committee, a majority of whose members are Outside Directors.
The review by the Compensation Advisory Committee shall be attended or observed by a compensation advisor, an external specialized institution, where necessary, for the purpose of providing an objective point of view as well as expert knowledge and information concerning compensation plans.

Maximum remuneration amount of the Directors

In accordance with the resolution of the 132nd Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on March 18, 2022, maximum amount of monetary remuneration payable to the Directors is ¥900 million or less for the basic remuneration (¥160 million or less for the Outside Directors) and ¥1,060 million or less for the annual bonus. The maximum aggregate amount of stock remuneration for the Directors was set at ¥900 million or less per year.

Remuneration of Audit & Supervisory Board Members

The remuneration for the Audit & Supervisory Board Members is determined after consultation among the Audit & Supervisory Board Members within the range of the maximum aggregate amount of remuneration approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders in consideration of the roles of the respective Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The remuneration for the Audit & Supervisory Board Members consists solely of “basic remuneration” considering the roles they play and the need to preserve their independence. The maximum aggregate amount of remuneration for the Audit & Supervisory Board Members is set at ¥250 million or less per year at the 132nd General Meeting of Shareholders held on March 18, 2022.